Financial Statement Intervention Daniel Nervo:
The group "For the Common Good", which I represent along with advisers and Mario Diego, is preparing to vote on the Financial Statement set out above.
E 'an accounting document by the double face: both correct, in terms of technical and formal, as questionable and foolish politically.
The political choices made by 'Administration in recent years have proved to be objectionable: there was more inspired by the cicada as the ant in Aesop's famous fable, forgetting that in life we \u200b\u200bmust be sighted. Not even the intervention of the then commissioner
Pellizzon managed to awaken the administration passed from the 'emphasis of doing and of building "has the sound of mortgages, which had fallen.
Mortgages that have so improved the country, even though there have been so-called "waste of public money," but at the same time, severely limiting any possibility of "movement" of the next administration and likely until 2025, date on which the pressure interest and capital allowances will decrease, and the municipal coffers, they will begin to "breathe."
A director should act with due diligence of the family, consider the public good as its trying to use the resources that are entrusted to him with wisdom and prudence.
Here, however, seems to have witnessed one concern: the consensus. They used the resources available to build consensus in order to rule instead of creating it with good governance.
The economic climate so difficult that our country is going through the entire global economic system, with severe cuts in public spending, further accentuate the lack of financial resources that might have breached, or otherwise limit, the inconvenience that our fellow citizens suffer, for example, in public schools.
Now, this administration has more or attention, however, until recently considered: the future.
Diego Andolfatto Intervention:
Democracy is a form of government in which popular sovereignty belongs to the people who exercise it through their freely elected representatives.
Once elected, however, the representatives should be made available to all citizens with information, news, accounts, balances ... ... .. but also plays clarity and transparency so that we can assess the quality of their function.
On the other hand, citizens are as interested in those who govern them "manage" the public res (res publica).
A mature democracy and complete, to be considered such, requires that the two axioms proceed hand in hand.
This evening we will try to make the group "For the common good Solan", ie we try to analyze the last years of administration is not based on speculation or conjecture, but with data from the deliberations of Cabinet and the Council, in order to assess with the goodness or otherwise of the work we're going to vote.
A question arises: how it was possible to do many works in a town so small and with little income limited?
To answer this question, simple in appearance, it must be assumed administrative analysis of the work of a few years ago, to begin to examine in a conscientious and objective, financial situation we're going to vote.
• DRAFT LOCAL GYM
(to help understand all the figures have been reported in €).
The assignment was given by the past administration Vanzo, Arch. Benetti and endorsed by:-Council resolution No Del1 92 July 1999, chaired by Mayor Bell, which was instructed the architect to draw up a new project first phase of the work only interesting building gym. - Council resolution No 39 of 12 April 2000, where it was approved the final design of the gym for a total of £ 1.412.823.600 equal to € 729,660.
So tender, some vicissitude with the company and competitor
- Resolution No. 85 of 25 May 2001 Arch. Benetti, with which it was paid the agreed sum of 29,261,578 lire equal to € 15,112 in total silence and balance of all its burden and demand, for a total of work done and approved by the Administration Bell, as written in Resolution of 103 million lire in total, amounted to € 53,195.
I can not figure out what planning policy has led to changes of the design, given that € 53,000 had been spent and that the resolution is written, "held at the same time to provide a review of design which, without entering into the aspects architectural, construction and assess the technological ones to determine whether, in light of new applications in construction, can be used and introduced into the project execution, technical solutions and materials and more functional " che, “tradotto” in un linguaggio comune significa: il progetto va bene ma vogliamo cambiare i materiali (i materiali sostituiti sono così innovativi che, per chi non lo sapesse, lasciano filtrare acqua all’interno della palestra stessa).
Poi segue un incarico ad altro architetto(arch. Cantele) … di cui, per onor di cronaca e trasparenza, citiamo i costi di progettazione e direzione dei lavori così suddivisi:
1. euro 125.313 per la palestra;
2. euro 43.720 per gli impianti sportivi esterni;
3. euro 15.600 per la strada adiacente agli impianti sportivi;
il tutto per un totale di euro 184.633.
Non bastasse, sul business plan, which is the instrument that would assess the financial sustainability of the work we're going to run (ie sports facilities) with a resolution of the Civil Law 5 of 26/02/2002, the "revenues from tariffs, a scheme should have been earned by the fee € 123,075 a year, with an hourly rate (as reported in Table 14) to € 4.50 and then with a 16/17.000 average net profit of around € per year.
A simple math shows immediately that, earned a similar amount, the sports facilities would have to work 24 hours a day, 365 days a year but for over 3 years.
Now compare the coverage of the service management of municipal sports facilities, 2009 as written on the opinion of the Audit, which speaks of service coverage of 18%, and with an income from fees of about € 20,000 (from 123,000 assumed so far!) and it all leads to result of € 90,000 annual passive. We avoid any kind of comment about the quality and sustainability of such an operation done by a small community like ours, by which we believe was built as much as possible interacting with the neighboring villages, but documentation on the tentative agreement or not we found no trace. •
RENEGOTIATION LOANS
skipped this question, pointing out that at least, acting City Council of 06/12/2005, this choice has been completed for a fee of € 85,283 be paid to the Fund deposits and loans for remodeling and elongation at 20 years of 12 mortgages that now bear the end of 2025, while giving the right to leave the City of new spaces for other loans, and we talked about at the time.
• CHILDCARE
Other textbook case, two other projects: let us stunned the political decision to build a nursery on the third floor of the 'old asylum, "(think a teacher should look after 6 children and that in case of emergency must bring them safely knowing that in these circumstances is not advisable to use the lift, I challenge anyone dei presenti a caricarsi sulle spalle 6 bambini e farsi tre piani di scale) ma la legge lo permetteva e si incarica della progettazione l’arch. Lorenzoni, che viene poi liquidato con 14.688 € (come riportato dal mandato n. 348 del 18 luglio 2007).
Poi qualcuno dalla Regione avvisa che la legge sta per cambiare e si dà così il via ad un altro progetto affidato ad un altro arch. per una spesa di 17.137 € con mandato n. 346 del 18 luglio 2007, con il quale a dire il vero non era stato nemmeno incaricato della progettazione, ma ci riserveremo più avanti di fare delle osservazioni di merito, più altri 2.400 € per una relazione del dott. Pierobon, liquidato con mandati n. 346 e 347, il tutto per un totale di 34.224 €.
Un asilo nido comunale non è sostenibile per un paese piccolo come il nostro, soprattutto con le nostre entrate, senza tener conto che a Pove del Grappa esisteva già da anni l’asilo nido integrato denominato “Le Coccinelle” e che due mesi dopo l’incarico di progettazione (14/02/2008) veniva inaugurato, sempre a Pove, un nuovo asilo nido che non riesce a saturare i posti esistenti, tradotto significa che ci sono posti disponibili.
Nel frattempo si è provveduto all’acquisto di una
• CASA IN VIA VILLANOVA,
di 64 mq su tre piani, per un totale di circa 13/14 mila € (spese comprese) alla quale si dovrebbero aggiungere altri 100.000 € circa di public money for its restructuring for all corporate purposes, forgetting that the City is already the owner of any apartment above the library is completely free. Here again a political choice
incomprehensible but undoubtedly an expenditure for municipal coffers.
But the real question is whether, in the face of such indebtedness by the independent city, all citizens have obtained, directly or indirectly, an advantage, and, especially, if that advantage is not to be borne by future generations, transforming so for them a real disadvantage.
Why are found in debt? Usually required to work for the State or the regions or municipalities, to fix the economy (in the case of a State), to help the weak and / or to gather support ...!
From a financial standpoint, however, it is estimated the strength of a state, a nation based on the debt ratio. E 'established by now that Italy is one of the most indebted countries, and that debt is around 118% of GDP. The Audit Office has calculated this ratio even in municipalities with an average Italian debt-GDP ratio by approximately 120%, this corresponds to 4% of GDP and refers to the stock of mortgages and loans accumulated by the Government that, for half of the Municipalities, always refers to the Court of Auditors, is "untenable" unless the shell extraordinary.
Let's try to do the same calculation for the City of Solan.
's current revenue was € 1,287,000, the outstanding debt amounted to € 2,713,236, a ratio equal to 210%. We feel that every consideration is unnecessary ...
Always the Court of Auditors, about a month ago, stated that the average indebtedness of Italian municipalities and 1,100 € per capita. If we look at what our town (then € 2,713,236 divided by 1921, the number of inhabitants) is the result of € 1,412 per capita, almost 30% of debt than the average Italian.
The consistency of the debt limit as per the decree of the Ministry of the Interior of 24 September 2009 not had to be over 150% revenue of € 1,930,006 to 2,713,236 that we have not.
leave to present their views on all!
Our vote, expressing a political opinion, can only be to blame, but technically, since the new course in the name of propriety, transparency, clarity and for all the effort and do not can only be beneficial because the only way to put an end to a certain modus operandi and begin a clear and transparent way of administering.
We try to be realistic but with a confident and positive look towards the future, hoping that by doing so, finally also the term Democracy Solan means a form of government practiced by the people, but the asset value and is responsible by voters (by exercising their right and duty to vote) and by those who administer (reminiscent of being a mere tool of democracy, with the sole duty to administer, that is to take care of things because others delegated by others for this purpose).
renew the appeal, however, first and foremost to all directors and all citizens of all political affiliations and social changes that they desire or pleasure to help us to continue this consolidation and a resumption of our common policy. Room to work there is something for everyone. Mario Carraro
Intervention:
Relazione dell’Assessore al Bilancio sul Conto Consuntivo Anno 2009.
Questa sera viene proposto alla Vostra approvazione il Conto Consuntivo relativo all’anno 2009. Il compito di illustrare questo Conto Consuntivo non dovrebbe essere a me attribuito, in quanto tutto ciò che andrò ad illustrare non è frutto della attività di questa Giunta Comunale.
Come è noto ho avuto l’incarico di Assessore al Bilancio solo nel 2010. Tutti i conteggi oggetto del Conto Consuntivo sono relativi alla situazione e ai movimenti registrati nel 2009. Altre persone hanno la responsabilità politica delle scelte operate dall’Amministrazione Comunale di Solagna e quindi a loro spetterebbe il compito di illustrare l’attività conducted in 2009 and submitted to our view their work.
At the end of my speech will still be able to make informed that the City Council and all citizens about the political motivations of their actions.
That said, just started the activity of this district council, we had to deal with the preparation of the budget, the City Council approved at its meeting of April 28, 2010. The next
our commitment is geared to preparation of the Final Account for the year 2009. E 'was significantly time-consuming and is only now come to you for approval as required a painstaking evaluation of all remaining assets and liabilities, da riportare all’inizio dell’anno 2010, quale atto obbligatorio e propedeutico per la definizione del conto stesso.
Passiamo quindi ad esaminare il Conto Consuntivo.
Per far capire cosa rappresentava la redazione del Bilancio Consuntivo e la fatica improba necessaria alla sua stesura basta pensare che è dovuto esaminare uno per uno tutti i residui attivi e passivi, ammontanti a circa 650, c’è voluto la competenza, la determinazione e l’impegno encomiabile da parte di tutto il personale.
Spendiamo solo alcune parole per illustrare il concetto di residui. Tutte le entrate e le uscite previste nei vari capitoli del Bilancio e non riscossi o pagati nel corso dell’anno, vengono portati nel Bilancio dell’anno as the next residue to honor and represent our initial receivables and payables. If these claims or debts then did not materialize should be removed and form of administration surplus or deficit of directors.
For example, expenditure commitments provided for the preparation of the Plan of Actions equal to 22,000.00 in the budget year 2009 was carried out in 2010 residues, can only be closed when work is finished, checked and payment of the professionals in charge. If the amount paid will be lower than that committed the difference of residue can be removed and will form surplus.
Like if you had provided an entry for aid, for example, for the work this summer and contribution was only partially recessed relative to the forecast, the difference was not built to be avoided as it is a credit not cash out and go more to erode surplus.
These operations allow us to verify the so-called "slurry seal" that is that our assets and liabilities are real and not fictitious. Just out of curiosity I
quantifies the residual assets taken in 2010 amounted to € 828,334.57, the arrears amounted to € 1,039,680.18. This means that the difference between residual income and expense amounts to € 211,346 and that amount is currently allocated in the initial fund cash-01.01.2010.
analysis of these residues shows that the longest residual liability is eliminated for the year 1996. This figure has been carried out every year for 14 years. The surplus is eliminated longest for the year 1986. This figure has been carried out every year for 24 years. Were removed and residual assets of € 140.207.67 € 107,073.84 in arrears, for a total of approximately € 247,000.00.
The rules state that each year the Board do this test, why certain residues have been held for so many years?? Perhaps to create surplus of administration? But surplus real or not??
Today, what attracts our attention is the sharp decline in the administration (the famous treasure).
This figure illustrates the significant amount of the deficit (we can also say loss) for the year. This means that from 1 January 2009 to December 31, 2009 the City has found poorer 161,945.2 Euro. If we take into consideration the waste management we need to remove other Euro 33,133.83. So we left and we got to 73,786.91 268,865.76, taking note however that it rimpiegato € 146,710.00 in 2009. At least now we can say that the surplus of € 73,786.91 is real and is expendable.
not draw deception in the stock of cash amounting to 285,132.52 euros. This figure at 31 December 2009 was municipal coffers, just deposited in the Treasury, is designed to pay debts already made by this Municipality.
An important element introduced in the report of the auditors of the case of mortgages. The report below is a list of two elements: € 2,713,236.00 (amount of loans signed at 31.12.2009 € 1,930,006.23 and the maximum mortgage we could conclude based on our income, that is based on the actual financial capacity . 783,230.00 difference. The result: a shrewd management of a good father would not indebted to the City than their ability to repay. The annual interest + capital is EUR 272,683.94, will remain unchanged until 2015, will decline to approximately 238,000 per year until 2025. Then the annual installment will drop to about 50,000 annually. The latest loan will be repaid in 2035. This points to a high level of debt, a large contraction of the financial statements present and future, and denies us the opportunity to take out loans in progress, even if there are any urgent cases.
other items that can be seen from the Report of the Executive
The Municipal Gym continues to accumulate debt. The coverage of costs is 18%. In fact, the costs amounted to 110,636.00 and the revenue amounted to 19,874.00. Loss Operating for the year 2009 Euro 90,762.00.
also to cover the waste disposal service have a net loss of 56,000.00. This has forced us to an increase of 25% of the fee for the service for the year 2010.
With a budget like the one that has been shown it is difficult to do anything. The objective we have set ourselves is to provide the Community of Solan, those services that make it a bit 'easier their lives. Every problem, however, must be investigated in further detail, especially from the economic point of view. Bringing the total inability of this municipality to have the smallest resource is very serious. And 'well-known that for every contribution received, the City has to contribute to the expense at its own expense as a percentage of 30-40%, but even that becomes impossible when you're in the presence of a budget so armored in the possibilities of choices and options. Paradoxically, we can ask for contributions, but we can not get to finish their work because we lack the financial capacity to assume the share borne by us. This means that we may be forced to renounce it.
This situation can not be resolved in just a short time. A look at debt capacity. I remember that we have incurred debts to 800,000.00 more than the current rules allow us, and this will lead to a lack of being able to take out loans for at least another 6-7 years. It would be madness to force our grandchildren to pay, given that our children are already committed to existing debts and we can not even count on an increase in revenue. Recovery of tax evasion ICI now amounts to EUR 88,000.00 and 26,000.00 Tarsu made this year thanks to a huge job-finding, will allow us to balance the accounts of the budget on the 2010, but good administration can not base their actions only on the activity of investigation, this is an instrument to be adopted for the fight against tax evasion to achieve social equity, not to deal with the current management.
With such a situation of balance I think it is appropriate to pause to reflect on the way forward to meet the needs of citizens, but at the same time we must also question the merit of each expenditure, use caution in the choices even if it means to be unpopular fools, but wise in forward-looking. E 'at a time when resources are scarce that we are all called to do better, if there is little money to spend, spend perhaps better, the value system changes before they are basic needs, education, health, safety and perhaps subsidies for cycling races, do you say?
Works public will be in several years, setting aside the surplus and trying not to borrow. It will do more checks and controls so everyone will be asked to pay, and maybe if everyone pays in the end we all pay less, I believe that in a small company like ours this is still possible, or at least we hope it.
I think all you've got to read carefully both the Final Account is the account of the reports of the Auditor and the City Council. Passing, then to any requests for clarification on specific items.
Explanation of vote:
To vote in favor of such a budget, but only from a technical standpoint and certainly not by Politically, we should do as he said good Indro Montanelli turiamoci the nose and vote DC "revised and corrected to" turiamoci nose and vote for this Financial Statement Year 2009.
